Friday, October 11, 2013

Losing the battles and winning the war, what a beautiful mind!



As usual, something important happened, that changed my original “schedule”. So we shall come back on one of our previous topic, due to a recent event;



General Vo Nguyen Giap died in a Hanoi hospital at the age of 102 (or 103 by the Vietnamese count).


“His surname Vo translates as "force" and his first name Giap means "strong armour", fitting perhaps for a man who helped bring about the defeat of major military powers.”









You may ask what all this to do with an economic blog? 




Besides the great respect to the General, yes, in fact a lot… But please be patient, we shall get there…

General Giap was undisputedly one of the best military strategists of the 20th century.

He used a number of unique tactics, like the "coordinated hit and run”, where the major objective was to occupy as much as possible enemy troops on alert, wear out their moral and distract their force.

“Giap was also the master of doing the unexpected. He played on the Western powers' belief that firepower alone determined victory. Their overconfidence and hubris was their downfall. 

No greater example of Giap's genius can be found than Dien Bien Phu. He demonstrated his flexibility and determination by having his men hand-transport artillery and anti aircraft guns into almost impenetrable terrain. By doing what his enemy considered impossible without modern means left the French garrison dumbstruck in an untenable position.”

http://www.dw.de/vo-nguyen-giap-a-master-of-revolutionary-war/a-17141733

At the same time he was able to maintain a high moral among his troops and the Nation.

“Giap understood that protracted warfare would cost many lives but that did not always translate into winning or losing the war. In the final analysis, Giap won the war despite losing many battles, and as long as the army survived to fight another day, the idea of Vietnam lived in the hearts of the people who would support it, and that is the essence of "revolutionary war."

"We had to use the small against the big; backward weapons to defeat modern weapons," Giap said.

 "At the end, it was the human factor that determined the victory."



All in all, the essence of the strategy is to adopt and to use the strategy of your enemy against him. Find your own weaknesses and use them as your power against your own opponent.

To force your enemy follow such a “game”, when he believes, that he is acting on his own, but in fact he is doing its actions the way you lay out.

This is in fact the most ancient eastern strategy, which Vietnam was perfecting for the last 5000 years. Seemingly very effectively.


There is one last sentence form General Giap:

"We can put the past behind," he said in 2000. "But we cannot completely forget it."

So one of the reasons we talk about this topic – just not to forget about it…

What is going on now? You remember the main topic!

Under the current GLOBAL economic rules the strong shall benefit, the weak shall suffer. Can we learn something form the General’s strategies? Certainly we should!




How important can be a proper strategy? It is decisive in most of the cases.




One of the worst military blunders of the history of mankind happened, when 100.000 british troops defending Singapore capitulated to 62.000 japanese troops of General Yamashita. The survivors you could see on the film “The Bridge on the River Kwai”…








Since then the World is laughing on British Lieutenant General A.E. Percival and Winston Churchill… 







Churchill admitted himself, that it was "the worst disaster and largest capitulation in British history."







Could be military tactics and strategies used in economic decision-making?

I let you think about this for yourselves…


And there is one more question…

Do we have a tool for how to use military tactics and strategies in our economic battles?



At 1903 December the 28th, a boy was born in Budapest, his name was Neumann János Lajos, as a first-born son of Neumann’s family.

We shall call him John later on.


So John happened to attend the Lutheran high school just meters from the place I started my primary school.

But the same place, the beautiful “Fasor” in Budapest could not influence me in having any particular talent in mathematics.

But John, or that time they called him “Jancsi”, was an extraordinary child prodigy in the areas of language, memorization, and mathematics. As a 6-year-old, he could divide two 8-digit numbers in his head. By the age of 8, he was familiar with differential and integral calculus. (Halmos, P.R. "The Legend of von Neumann". The American Mathematical Monthly-volume= 80 (4–year=1973): 382–394.)

When I was young, I was dreaming about to get just a little of the talent of that Jancsi from our neighbourhood, so with my classmates, we searched each house, each corner from the roof to the underground passages of that district, but no… We could not find the secret of Jancsi’s talent…

But we found something on those roofs, passages and under those old buildings. For Peter, Gabriel and me. We found there also something valuable - friendship, solidarity, unity and freedom. That is what escorts us during our life till now.

Jancsi got his Ph.D. at the age of 22 in Budapest.

Probably those were some special years. Jancsi was part of a Budapest generation noted for intellectual achievement: he was born in Budapest around the same time as Theodore von Kármán (b. 1881), George de Hevesy (b. 1885), Leó Szilárd (b. 1898), Eugene Wigner (b. 1902), Edward Teller (b. 1908), and Paul Erdős (b. 1913).

But let’s stay with Jancsi or better call him from now on, John…

At 1926 he was already in Berlin and in 1930 he was invited to Princeton!


He has invented many things – among them you may recall his works in quantum mechanics, linear programming, nuclear technology, computer science…

I had the honor to learn about his game theory at 1980. I must admit, that this theory fascinated me.

He improved and extended the minimax theorem to include games involving imperfect information and games with more than two players, publishing this result in his 1944 Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (written with Oskar Morgenstern).

So what is the Game theory about?



I must admit, that I was trying to find some human language explanation for you…

Trust me, it was hard…

So please now clear your mind and read the simplest explanation I have found:

“According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy online, game theory is: 

"the study of the ways in which strategic interactions among rational players produce outcomes with respect to the preferences (or utilities) of those players, none of which might have been intended by any of them."


According to Wikipedia, game theory "attempts to mathematically capture behavior in strategic situations, in which an individual's success in making choices depends on the choices of others."

According to an online source, game theory is "a concept that deals with the formulation of the correct strategy that will enable an individual or entity, when confronted by a complex challenge, to succeed in addressing that challenge."



It involves the study of how the final outcome of a competitive situation is dictated by interactions among people involved based on the goal and preferences of those players, and on the strategy that each player employs. It was developed on the premise that for whatever circumstance, or for whatever game, there is a strategy that will allow one to win. “
http://math2033.uark.edu/wiki/index.php/Game_Theory


And then I also try to say it in even more simple way… 

The game theory helps you to find possible ways to interact with your opponents depending on their and your situation. Or how your decision will influence your result in a given situation. Sometimes you can follow the way to maximize your gains. However sometimes you need to focus on minimizing your losses… You and your opponent’s situation is modelled in a matrix (now they would call it simply as an excel sheetJ)

Why it is so important?


John with his colleague Oscar used this theory to model economic situations…

So still, why we need to know about it?

So simple… By this theory and further improved versions we can simulate almost all kind of behaviors and processes, including the war strategies…

And why we need to be able to simulate the war strategies?

Uhhh. Just to be able to make proper decisions for our economy… right?

We need to mention one more genius contributing the theory of games.

Most of you have seen the “A Beautiful Mind” – the Hollywood film with Russell Crowe.


The Nash equilibrium is a solution concept of a non-cooperative game involving two or more players, in which each player is assumed to know the equilibrium strategies of the other players, and no player has anything to gain by changing only their own strategy unilaterally. If each player has chosen a strategy and no player can benefit by changing strategies while the other players keep theirs unchanged, then the current set of strategy choices and the corresponding payoffs constitute a Nash equilibrium.


Stated simply, Amy and Wili are in Nash equilibrium if Amy is making the best decision she can, taking into account Wili's decision, and Wili is making the best decision he can, taking into account Amy's decision. Likewise, a group of players are in Nash equilibrium if each one is making the best decision that he or she can, taking into account the decisions of the others.


Game theorists use the Nash equilibrium concept to analyse the outcome of the strategic interaction of several decision makers. In other words, it provides a way of predicting what will happen if several people or several institutions are making decisions at the same time, and if the outcome depends on the decisions of the others. The simple insight underlying John Nash's idea is that one cannot predict the result of the choices of multiple decision makers if one analyzes those decisions in isolation. Instead, one must ask what each player would do, taking into account the decision-making of the others.
Nash equilibrium has been used to analyze hostile situations like war and arms races, and also how conflict may be mitigated by repeated interaction.

It has also been used to study to what extent people with different preferences can cooperate, and whether they will take risks to achieve a cooperative outcome. It has been used to study the adoption of technical standards, and also the occurrence of bank runs and currency crises. Other applications include traffic flow, how to organize auctions, the outcome of efforts exerted by multiple parties in the education process, regulatory legislation such as environmental regulations, and even penalty kicks in soccer.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_equilibrium


John Forbes Nash, Jr. earned a Nobel Prize at 1994 for his work.


One is for fact, both Johns were engaged in several super secret military and security projects in the USA, so part of their work we can expect to become public only at later stage. For Neumann it was known, that he participates in the US nuclear program. Most probably as consequence he developed a bone pancreatic cancer. John died at age 53, at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C. under military security lest he reveal military secrets while heavily medicated.


The work on the analysis of complex systems is constantly going on. The game theory earned several Nobel prizes for the later contributors. There appeared 3 dimensional, dynamic and other type of game theory models... However we are still lack of the ability to handle close to reality complex systems in the field of economics and far away of being understand and predict the economy in GLOBAL terms.

However there are some encouraging signs….

This year the Nobel Prize for chemistry went to a trio, who managed to model the chemical reactions… Or let’s say in simple words, they have invented something, which shall save a lot of time, money and efforts to conduct live tests.  They have managed to simulate chemical process by computer simulation… (By the way based again on the invent of the above mentioned John Neumann in quantum mechanics)…




“As with any model, the laureates' is a simplified version of reality. But at least it is no longer a dumbed-down one. Striving for anything else would, of course, be to miss the point of building a model in the first place. To quote Albert Einstein, a model must be as simple as possible—but no simpler. And in creating one, the three winners also brought chemistry fully into the computer age.”


http://www.economist.com/blogs/babbage/2013/10/2013-nobel-prizes-chemistry

Please do not forget their names!

Martin Karplus of Harvard, Michael Levitt of Stanford and Arieh Warshel of the University of Southern California - well done gentleman!









If you have remained any more patience, I want to treat you with another interesting dilemma. The mathematic modelling of the Rubik's Cube...

What this cube does with economics?

If you love maths, just watch this video with a simple explanation and sometimes later we shall come back on this...

http://vimeo.com/63887614









Hopefully I did not make you too much tired this time, so we shall try to follow with some simple tactics next time...


No comments:

Post a Comment